Wednesday, July 30, 2003

Businesses on Ohio 4 object to makeover

By Jennifer Edwards
The Cincinnati Enquirer

FAIRFIELD - Plans to revitalize one of the city's oldest and most traveled business strips may be headed for a dead end.

For the past year, merchants and landowners along Ohio 4 have objected to the plan to spruce up the 5.9-mile stretch of the road through Fairfield, from Springdale to Hamilton.

And this week, after dozens of business owners packed council chambers to repeat their concerns, City Council sent the project to the planning commission for salvaging.

"I think it should be thrown out," Harold Maggard of the Dixie Deli told Fairfield leaders. "I don't think we need any more zoning or ordinances to restrict our businesses."

On Tuesday, some council members said the plan should be shelved. It has been watered down since it was proposed and now mostly includes landscaping, improved signs and entrance "gateways."

Why move forward, many said, when so many merchants are opposed?

According to the city's finance department, Fairfield has spent $154,266.26 on consulting work for the plan.

What's more, council members added, it could cost about $180,000 a year to maintain the new landscaping.

"We just committed to a $13 million justice center, and we may need to tighten our belts on some of the other projects," Councilwoman Jill Kinder said.

Since 1999, Fairfield has planned to clean up and make safety improvements along Ohio 4, which carries about 42,000 vehicles a day and is dotted with some 350 businesses.

City officials have earmarked $2 million for landscaping, intersection improvements and other steps. They also have applied for a federal grant to fund some of the cost.

As properties along Ohio 4 redevelop, it is expected the landowners would contribute to beautification.

But members of the Route 4 Business Association worry that beautification efforts will cause them to lose access off the road into their buildings, costing them customers.

The city has removed a previous recommendation of installing some medians in the road to control traffic.

But the business owners still are upset. They do not want to be required to install landscaping, saying it would block motorists' views of their properties.

They also want the speed limit reduced on the entire strip to 35 mph.

"We are here tonight as a last resort," Tom Burer of Winton Development, a founding member of the coalition, told council.

Burer and other coalition members say the plan should "embrace," rather than "try to hide," mainstay businesses along Ohio 4 such as car and boat dealerships.

"If they left, Route 4 would look like a ghost town."

Burer also stressed that the design portion of the plan is vague, saying he is concerned the brunt of the expense would be left to landowners.


Teen driving clinic founded on grief, hope
Safer roads: Teen drivers weigh in
Clinics teach safety for fledgling drivers
Senate has few Dems for Springer
Shooting of boy rattles 2nd Ward

Empty feeling hurting College Hill
Pay raises proposed for public defenders
New shows added as Hamilton County Fair opens today
Picture of the day: Acoustic Lunch
Tristate A.M. Report

Smith-Amos: Over-the-Rhine task force needs more involvement
Howard: Some Good News
Crowley: Giuliani appearance to be open

Flood victims hold off on lawsuit
Businesses on Ohio 4 object to makeover
Mason grants compensation for magistrate's extra duties
Prof: Resistance transcends Saddam
State stalls plans for BMV locations

William Groll, mechanic who loved boating

Dance party swings for record
Injured-workers bill fine-tuned
Hearing today for seat on court
Ohio Moments

N.Ky. bishop's first year marked by crisis, grace
Dead wife's ex-lover testifies in day two of murder trial
Residents speak out on riverfront
Therapy program to host rodeo
Mall project alarms mobile home residents
New YMCA under way
Kentucky obituaries