Saturday, May 31, 2003

Justice joins Paducah environmental lawsuit


Plant handled radioactive, hazardous waste

By Nancy Zuckerbrod
The Associated Press

WASHINGTON - The Justice Department is joining a lawsuit that alleges a subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corp. illegally stored and disposed of radioactive and hazardous waste and defrauded the government while the company was a contractor at the nuclear facility in Paducah, Ky.

The Justice Department announced its decision Friday - four years after a plant worker, two retired employees and the Natural Resources Defense Council filed their suit in federal court in Kentucky.

"We're extremely pleased that they're intervening," said attorney Joseph Egan, who represents the workers and the environmental group. "In a case like this, it's very important to have the resources of the government behind you."

Lockheed Martin Energy Systems and its corporate predecessors conducted key operations at the uranium enrichment plant for the Energy Department from 1984 through 1998. The suit accuses the company of violating environmental laws by dumping radioactive waste and hazardous materials in landfills at the plant and nearby.

The suit also accuses the company of submitting false claims with the government to illegally obtain fees it didn't deserve. Whistleblowers are entitled to a share of any money recovered in such cases.

The suit doesn't put a dollar figure on the alleged wrongdoing. But one source close to the case, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, estimated the plaintiffs would seek more than $1 billion.

In a statement, Bethesda, Md.-based Lockheed Martin Corp. denied any wrongdoing. "We strongly believe that the allegations are without merit," it stated.

The Justice Department declined to throw its support behind two of the lawsuit's allegations. Those include complaints that the company misled the government about how well it protected its workers from radiation and that the company introduced radioactively contaminated metals into interstate commerce.

Egan said the statute of limitations had expired on the interstate commerce complaint, and he noted that a separate class-action lawsuit dealt with the worker exposure complaint.




TOP STORIES
Aquarium seeking $4.5M expansion
Domestic killing charge upgraded
Brace for temps in 40s

IN THE TRISTATE
Whittier Elementary's principal says farewell
Colerain looks at kids' curfew
Pandering conviction voided
Frampton to play game
Blue Ash deputy manager resigns
Obituary: Jeffrey L. Wise, 18, criminology major in college
Tristate A.M. Report

ENQUIRER COLUMNISTS
GUTIERREZ: Family Leave Act
McNUTT: Neighborhoods
Faith Matters: Rabbi's twin in town for ceremony

BUTLER, WARREN, CLERMONT
Springer stars in Butler Co.
Crash kills 2 in West Chester; driver charged
GOP calls off seat-switch
Fairfield trio take separate paths
Possible bomb in Union park

OHIO
Buckeye Egg cited by FDA for ignoring rules
Boy's family drops alternative method to treat leukemia
24-hour cameras watch Cleveland street for crime
Tank's success in Iraq reflects well on Lima factory
Ohio Moments

KENTUCKY
Day camp meets the needs of kids who cope with cancer
Pendleton Co. investigates inmate abuse at Grant jail
Patton signs discrimination ban
Anti-smoking group brings fight close to home
Court strikes part of school nepotism law
Ky. Wesleyan president to step down
Students charged in huffing
Mine may account for bad water
Kentucky obituaries
More doctors face discipline
Critics upset by mining study
Fla. man files suit for abuse by Ky. priest
One person killed when blaze destroys mobile home
Justice joins Paducah environmental lawsuit