The Associated Press
GIRARD, Ohio - An adoption dispute between a boy's Kentucky birth parents and an Ohio couple who have raised him has been sitting before the Kentucky Supreme Court for almost a year.
The court has not ruled on the two-state custody battle over Justin, who turns 6 later this month, since it heard arguments Feb. 15, 2002.
The court typically decides cases in about six months, said Susan Stokley Clary, administrator for the Kentucky Supreme Court.
Richard and Cheryl Asente took custody of Justin in February 1998, shortly before his first birthday. The Asentes had adopted Justin's 7-year-old brother, Joey, in 1995. Joey's adoption is not an issue.
Both boys were born to Regina Moore and Jerry Dorning, an unmarried couple from Northern Kentucky.
Two months after Justin began living with the Asentes, his birth parents asked for his return.
The Asentes refused, setting off a series of court fights in Ohio and Kentucky over the blue-eyed, redheaded boy.
Justin has been living with the Asentes in their home near Youngstown and sees his birth parents about every three weeks.
Kent Markus, director of the National Center for Adoption Law and Policy at Capital University in Columbus, called the Kentucky Supreme Court's delay "embarrassing."
He said the harm caused to families by legal delay has driven advocates to push courts to speed up the process.
The Asentes call the court every month on the day it announces decisions, praying to hear that Justin will remain with them. This month, the court issues decisions on Feb. 20.
"We're trying to maintain a positive attitude," Mrs. Asente said. "It's hard to wait, but it is better to wait than have a bad ruling."
Justin's birth parents do not wish to comment on the case, attorney Glenda Harrison, of Legal Aid of the Bluegrass, said Monday.
The issue before the Kentucky Supreme Court is the validity of the "voluntary and informed" consent agreement that Moore and Dorning signed in January 1998, when Justin was 11 months old. By signing, the couple agreed to relinquish their parental rights and start a formal adoption process.
Moore and Dorning have argued that their former attorney misinformed them about a deadline for changing their minds about the adoption.
TOP LOCAL STORIES
Chief supports officer in shooting
'Survivor' hopefuls go to extremes
Employers boost call-up benefits for reservists
Callups thin police, fire departments
Educators, parents protest school funding cuts
Walking man's goal: Great Wall
RADEL: Mistakes weren't repeated after fatal shooting
PULFER: Climbing on scales at airport
PHOTOS OF THE DAY
Dog rescued from icy pond
Jogging in the snow
Soldier of snow
Library circulation falls
Audits would precede levies
Recreation chief chided over lobbying
Children respond to terrier
AROUND THE TRISTATE
Tristate A.M. Report
Access social services: Call 211
Regulators give green light to doctor-pay comparisons
Good News: Bluegrass, gospel come to East End
Obituary: William Love led church in hymns
Fairfield city manager gets 13.6% raise
More testing expected for lead
Teen's dilemma: Take new car or $20K?
Labor activists target Miami
Fairfield 2-mill school levy on May 6 ballot
HUD to monitor Butler Co. housing agency
Clermont bus notices called false
Ohio Moments: Edison's bright ideas hatched at home
Ludlow halts classes to plea for school funding
Uzbekistan aliens held in N.Ky.
Justin appeal nears 1 year
Florence police focus on growth of Hispanics
Patton: No plans to resign