Sunday, February 9, 2003

'Death tax' has bad reputation

By Rhonda Abrams
Gannett News Service

Save small businesses. Save family farms. You'll soon hear those cries as Congress considers permanently eliminating the estate tax.

Don't be fooled. Estate tax opponents are taking refuge under Main Street awnings. The true beneficiaries are the descendents of the enormously wealthy.

Because it's the fabulously rich who'll benefit from eliminating estate taxes, the man leading the fight to keep the tax is surprising: William Gates Sr. Yes, the father of "the" Bill Gates. Gates Sr. and co-author Chuck Collins have written a clear and compelling book in support of the estate tax, "Wealth and Commonwealth: Why America Should Tax Accumulated Fortunes." (Beacon Press, $25).

"If that money is not there, then the funds are going to have to be raised in some other form," said Gates. "It's particularly unfortunate (abolishing the tax) at a time when we have the accretion of huge wealth. Ever since this country was started, we've been anxious to avoid the evils of aristocracy," said Gates.

Estate tax opponents claim it dampens the entrepreneurial spirit, but history proves otherwise. Instituted in 1916, the tax was a response to the vast fortunes amassed by the handful of robber barons and industrialists. Along with other progressive-era reforms, such as restricting monopolies, the estate tax was designed to make competition fairer for newer, smaller enterprises.

Nevertheless, the tax got a bad reputation. Part of the problem was that the amount of an estate excluded from taxation wasn't adjusted for inflation. Before 2000, the exclusion was $600,000. Even so, fewer than 2 percent of estates were subject to tax.

In 2001, Congress responded with what some call the "Throw Mama from the Train Act." The law lowers tax rates and increases exemptions between 2001 and 2009. Then, the tax is repealed entirely - for one year. After that, it reverts to 2000 levels. In other words, if you're very rich, the best time to die is 2010.

Gates and Collins recommend reform, not repeal, of the estate tax. "There needs to be substantial increase in the exempt amount," suggested Gates. He puts the figure for businesses at $7 million.

Increasing the exempt amount - rather than repealing the law - means few businesses of any size would be subject to estate tax. Look at the numbers for the year 2000:

• 108,322 total estate tax returns.

• 4,218 taxable estates with "closely held stock" (e.g., small or family businesses).

If you raise the exemption for small businesses?

• $5 million: 1,773 taxable estates.

• $10 million: 873 taxable estates.

OK, but what about double taxation? The people who made their money paid taxes once. Is it fair their estate pays again?

"The bulk of assets in taxable estates are appreciated stocks and assets that have never been taxed," said Gates. "It's the opposite of double taxation."

Repeal advocates call it the "death tax." That's fine by me.

Frankly, I can't think of any time I'd rather pay taxes than after I'm dead. Nobody likes taxes. But as taxes go, the estate tax is one of the best.

Rhonda Abrams is the author of "The Successful Business Plan" and "The Successful Business Organizer." Register to receive her free business tips at

SEC says trader took investors' money, lived large
East End eyes development warily
5/3 anxiously awaits end of federal inquiry
Dig a bit to find gold in reports
Business Meetings This Week
Commercial Real Estate Projects & Transfers

Couple learn about business by buying one
Unpaid bills bane of small business
'Death tax' has bad reputation
Business Notebook

Parallels with '91 fade fast
Amnesty for returning shuttle debris ends