Saturday, October 26, 2002

Evendale rehab to be reviewed



By Jenny Callison
Enquirer contributor

EVENDALE - Persistent criticism from some in its business community has prompted village officials to take another look at their vision for revitalizing Reading Road.

IF YOU GO
What: Public meeting to discuss Evendale's Reading Road urban renewal plan
When: 7 p.m. Tuesday
Where: Municipal building, 10500 Reading Road
Information: 563-2244.
Following several months of holding "visioning" sessions for property owners in the area, the municipality has decided to review the document that underlies its community improvement efforts: an urban renewal plan completed in August 2001.

The village has scheduled a public meeting for Tuesday, during which property owners within the urban renewal area can suggest changes to the urban renewal plan.

The plan included a "blighted" declaration for properties within the study area, based on criteria established by the federal government.

While the village stated the designation was merely a step toward improvements an urban renewal process could foster, a group of property owners took issue with it, questioning both the plan's effect and village officials' motives in pursuing it. Business owners like M. Patrick Marston and Bruce Hassel fear the value of their properties has declined as a result of being labeled "blighted." They also say that the village did not provide adequate notice of its intent to pursue the urban renewal designation.

The controversy led village officials to consult attorney Tim Burke, whose firm, Manley Burke, has been involved with the development of urban renewal plans for Wyoming, Wilmington, Ohio; Lockland, Fairfield, Norwood and Milford.

At Mr. Burke's recommendation, officials decided to re-examine the plan, implementing a process that will emphasize public input and discussion.

In a letter to property owners, Mayor Douglas A. Lohmeier said Tuesday's meeting is aimed at getting citizen comment. He defended the urban renewal plan as "an important tool to assist local government in controlling the quality of development in its community."

Dan Regenold, who has been a vocal opponent of the village's approach to urban renewal, isn't convinced.

"The reason they are amending the plan is because they realize they made mistakes and are on shaky legal ground because they did not give proper notice prior to passage," the Evendale business owner said.




TOP STORIES
Hagan, Taft in a nutshell? Cleveland, Cincinnati
Higher ed budget plans disputed
Archdiocese criticizes P&G
More robberies, many at gunpoint
Kenton payroll tax increase ruled legal by state court

IN THE TRISTATE
Sculpture embraces character
Obituary: Kash Amburgy, preacher, salesman
Rain, rush-hour traffic result in rash of wrecks
Evendale rehab to be reviewed
Green Twp. trustees square off

ENQUIRER COLUMNISTS
RADEL: Issue 7
GUTIERREZ: Dueling politicians
Faith Matters

BUTLER, WARREN, CLERMONT
Teen driver to serve 6 months
Cross burning in rural Oxford Twp. investigated
School gets OK for athletic fields
Final bell sounds for old No. 7
Fairfield fund-raiser a runaway success
Miami 2 Miami trail on track

OHIO
GOP cash pours in for 2 Democrat seats
Hundreds mourn Browns owner
Woman's family questions her death in facility
Police still get tips about murder of girl
Man guilty in killing of girlfriend's fetus
Gripes might be bogus, but . . .

KENTUCKY
Small-county races have big impact
Trauth considers buying Newport school
U of L bioterror center recognized
Boone Co. and Y have deal for recreation
Poll: Most in Ky. oppose execution for juvenile criminals
Doctors want malpractice law changed
Natural Resources secretary James Bickford dies