By James Pilcher
The Cincinnati Enquirer
While some Cincinnati City Council members Monday expressed support for aspects of the $2.7 billion MetroMoves plan, the debate over the city earnings tax is likely to keep council from taking an official stance on the Hamilton County ballot issue.
Councilman John Cranley said he was "adamantly opposed" to Issue 7 unless Metro and its governing board guarantee that the portion of the earnings tax it now receives would be phased out if the ballot initiative is passed on Nov. 5. He got no such guarantee.
"This would provide further disincentive for firms to develop or settle here, because they would be doubly taxed," Mr. Cranley said of a sales tax in addition to the earnings tax. "We would be making it cheaper for firms to settle outside the city and thereby subsidizing our own job loss."
Monday's session of council's community development and intragovernmental relations committee was intended to allow Metro officials to give an "information only" briefing on its plan, which includes a 60-mile, $2.6 billion light rail system.
A half-cent increase in the Hamilton County sales tax would cover the local portion. Proponents say the rest would come from federal and state budgets.
Metro general manager and chief executive officer Paul Jablonski as well as transit board chairman Peter D. Gomsak Jr. outlined the plan. They had support from committee chairwoman Minette Cooper and Jim Tarbell. David Crowley said he liked the plan as a practical matter, but expressed reservations about the financing.
But Mr. Cranley, chairman of council's finance committee, as well as Mayor Charlie Luken, criticized the plan directly, the first time the mayor has taken a stance.
"If I were talking to someone on the West Side, I would tell them that it is not going to happen there," Mr. Luken said. "It is speculation at best that you could tell anybody on the West Side that they would have light rail there in the next couple of decades."
The plan does include a light rail line along Interstate 74 to Dent, but Metro officials have not said when such a line would be built under the 23-year plan.
Mr. Cranley said that he had been negotiating with Metro officials, even before they put the sales tax issue on the ballot, about the local earnings tax issue. Currently, 3 percentage points of the 2.1 percent city earnings tax raises about $38 million annually for the local portion of Metro's annual expenses.
Mr. Cranley promised Mr. Gomsak that if he were to guarantee that the earnings tax would be phased out, he would support the ballot initiative.
Mr. Gomsak said he could not make such a promise.
Lemmie orders action on cops in Owensby case
Background on officers: All on force 6 years or less
Great Neighborhoods Special Section: Mason and Deerfield Township
Mason enjoying new city building
Homecoming queen passes crown to friend
RADEL: Readers have terminal case of reactions
Cranley questions `double' Metro tax
Evolution would be theory No. 1
Congressional foes split on ideas
Taft, Hagan debate tonight in Dayton
Deters touts fiscal savvy in TV ad
Officials consent to school's demolition
Ex-UC player Little goes on trial for roommate assault
Men risk lives in rescue from burning car
Man, 65, gets 13 years as molester
Guard accused of sex with prisoner
Unbeaten neighbors gird for gridiron
Butler Co. takes steps to update voting system
Teacher travels the earth
Good News: Youths vow to make a difference
You Asked For It
Obituary: Thomas J. Schmidt, 88, selfless
Prayer service focuses on Iraq
Ft. Wright residents asked for OK on street, sewer tax
Judge recuses in Patton lawsuit