Cincinnati.Com
NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help
Currently:
30°F
Mostly Cloudy
Weather | Traffic
The Enquirer
HOME
NEWS
ENTERTAINMENT
SPORTS
REDS
BENGALS
LOCAL GUIDE
MULTIMEDIA
ARCHIVES
SEARCH
 
 TODAY'S ENQUIRER 
 Front Page 
-- Local News 
 Sports 
 Business 
 Editorials 
 Tempo 
 Home Style 
 Travel 
 Health 
 Technology 
 Weather 
 Back Issues 
 Search 
 Subscribe 

 SPORTS 
 Bearcats 
 Bengals 
 High School 
 Reds 
 Xavier 

 VIEWPOINTS 
 Jim Borgman 
 Columnists 
 Readers' views 

 ENTERTAINMENT 
 Movies 
 Dining 
 Horoscopes 
 Lottery Results 
 Local Events 
 Video Games 

 CINCINNATI.COM 
 Giveaways 
 Maps/Directions 
 Send an E-Postcard 
 Coupons 
 Visitor's Guide 

 CLASSIFIEDS 
 Jobs 
 Cars 
 Homes 
 Obituaries 
 General 
 Place an ad 

 HELP 
 Feedback 
 Subscribe 
 Search 
 Newsroom Directory 




 
Monday, October 14, 2002

Sludge pit proposal sparks controversy in Fairfield


Officials fear Water Works suit

By Jennifer Edwards
The Cincinnati Enquirer

FAIRFIELD - In one of the most controversial issues to hit this community in years, a proposed sludge pit behind upscale homes has pitted neighbors against city leaders and threatens to further divide the city if it is approved this month.

If the pit for lime residue is denied, Greater Cincinnati Water Works could sue Fairfield for the right to dump waste, city leaders fear.

"This sludge pit issue is the most painful and difficult decision we have ever had to make since I have been on council," Councilwoman Jill Kinder said. "It's not that we're scared we are going to get sued, but you have to look at personal property rights. At what level is government intervention allowed?"

City Council will vote Oct. 28 whether to allow the construction of a nine-acre sludge pit for lime residue at the Water Works water plant on River Road, which serves northern Hamilton County. Council begins hearing public comment at Tuesday's 7 p.m. meeting.

Neighbors who will live near the basin have vowed to launch a referendum drive to overturn a council approval.

In recent months, they held petition drives and plastered signs all over Fairfield that read: "Just Say No To The Fairfield Sludge Pit."

They maintain the lime basin will bring reduced property values, blight and noise to their subdivisions, the Monastery and Riverside Estates, which hold some of the most expensive homes in Fairfield, averaging at about $300,000. The pit would sit about one-third mile from these homes.

Residents also have environmental concerns and question why Water Works officials don't recycle the lime residue, as the city of Fairfield does.

Most council members have said they either oppose the pit or are leaning that way. Just one council member has publicly supported it - Jeffrey Holtegel, who motioned to approve it last month at the city's Planning Commission meeting.

Some council members said they fear if they do not allow the pit, Greater Cincinnati Water Works could fight the issue in court and win. Then the city wouldn't have as much control over the pit's construction and operation.

Water Works officials want to build a new pit on land they already own because their existing one, in Ross Township, is reaching capacity. The new pit would be capped in about 30 years.

Greater Cincinnati Water Works' total operations include water supply and treatment for the city, most Hamilton County communities, and portions of Clermont, Butler and Warren counties, including Mason. David Rager, director of Water Works, said it's not practical to recycle lime residue because there's such a large amount. Residents would be more upset if the substance was taken off site, dragging dirt onto Fairfield streets, he maintained.

"The beauty of this is we are containing everything on our property," Mr. Rager said. "This is not a hazardous material. We have faith Fairfield will listen to the facts, understand the issues and do the right thing."

If the pit is denied, however, he said his staff will try to work out the dispute with Fairfield. But he stressed that a lawsuit is not foreseeable.

The pit was approved at the commission's Sept. 25 meeting - with 16 conditions, which include requiring Water Works to preserve 1,000 feet directly west of one subdivision as green space.

Water Works also must install a 6-foot-high chain link fence with locked gates around the site, which will be inspected semi-annually.

E-mail jedwards@enquirer.com.



Budget battle holds up projects
Light rail wed to bus route growth
HUC leader looks to the future
Sludge pit proposal sparks controversy in Fairfield
BRONSON: This is Ohio on drugs
Experience an issue in judicial race
Redistricting changes faces, races
Ohio Campaign Notebook
Ohio Capitol Notebook
Countdown to Nov. 5
Princeton asks input on buildings plan
Taylor High name change opposed
Documentary filmmaker Charles Eli Guggenheim dies
Artist Fannie Isidor created works almost all of her life
Local Digest
Traficant team thinks he can be elected from jail
Suspect's parole revisited
Poll: Approval falls for Ind. gov.
Vincennes hopes $1 million river path will boost Ind. city

 

Latest Headline News
Updated Every 30 Minutes
AP TOP HEADLINE NEWS

Iraqi Official: 150,000 Civilians Dead

Sen. Allen Concedes Defeat in Virginia

Bush, Pelosi Hold White House Talks

Massive Recall of Acetaminophen Underway

Mubarak Warns Against Hanging Saddam

Bolton Unlikely to Win Senate Approval

AP: Startling Findings in Tillman Probe

Ed Bradley of '60 Minutes' Dies at 65

U.S. Rises in Auto Reliability Ratings

49ers Look to Relocate New Stadium



Cincinnati.Com
Search our site by keyword:  
Search also: News | Jobs | Homes | Cars | Classifieds | Obits | Coupons | Events | Dining
Movies/DVDs | Video Games | Hotels | Golf | Visitor's Guide | Maps/Directions | Yellow Pages

  CINCINNATI.COM  |  NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help


Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors | Subscribe
Newspaper advertising | Web advertising | Place a classified | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2007. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 12/19/2002.