Cincinnati.Com
NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help
Currently:
17°F
Mostly Cloudy
Weather | Traffic
The Enquirer
HOME
NEWS
ENTERTAINMENT
SPORTS
REDS
BENGALS
LOCAL GUIDE
MULTIMEDIA
ARCHIVES
SEARCH
 
 TODAY'S ENQUIRER 
 Front Page 
 Local News 
-- Sports 
 Business 
 Editorials 
 Tempo 
 Home Style 
 Travel 
 Health 
 Technology 
 Weather 
 Back Issues 
 Search 
 Subscribe 

 SPORTS 
 Bearcats 
 Bengals 
 High School 
 Reds 
 Xavier 

 VIEWPOINTS 
 Jim Borgman 
 Columnists 
 Readers' views 

 ENTERTAINMENT 
 Movies 
 Dining 
 Horoscopes 
 Lottery Results 
 Local Events 
 Video Games 

 CINCINNATI.COM 
 Giveaways 
 Maps/Directions 
 Send an E-Postcard 
 Coupons 
 Visitor's Guide 
 Web Directory 

 CLASSIFIEDS 
 Jobs 
 Cars 
 Homes 
 Obituaries 
 General 
 Place an ad 

 HELP 
 Feedback 
 Subscribe 
 Search 
 Newsroom Directory 



 
Thursday, May 09, 2002

Choosing golf ball can be boggling


Pro's advice can be best way to select

By Carey Hoffman
Enquirer contributor

        The scene at pro-shop counters this spring can be described as confusion. The colorful packaging of a dozen or more brands of golf balls beckon consumers from behind the counters. For retailers, the task is even more daunting — ball selections are so extensive, they stretch over two aisles.

        Distance balls, performance balls, titanium-core balls. One-piece, two-piece, three-piece. Low-compression, high-launch. Hexagonal patterns.

        About 75 percent of the cost of golf balls goes toward marketing, which includes endorsement money for top pros and intense advertising campaigns. Hardly a break goes by on weekend golf telecasts without at least one ball commercial.

        But beyond the prestige of playing Tiger's ball (or Sergio's, Arnie's or Annika's, for that matter), what's in it for you? How does an average golfer, with a different weakness for every day of the week, make an informed decision?

        Don't be afraid to rely on your pro, said longtime area professional Bob Hauer.

        “It's just like doctors recommending a medicine to you,” he said. “It's very hard for you to do on your own.”

        Said Luke Reese, vice president and general manager of Wilson Golf: “If you're talking about a 30-handicapper, then don't waste a lot of time making the decision. They've got other issues. But if it's a player with a 20 handicap or below, someone who has shot a round of 90 before, it is relevant.”

Balanced is better

        Reese is at the center of the biggest controversy in golf this year. Wilson wowed attendees at the annual PGA Merchandise show in January with its new Staff True balls, billed as the first perfectly balanced ball in the game.

        Wilson said science was on its side, using a putting robot to hit more than 24,000 balls to show that some perfectly struck putts of unbalanced balls, at 10 feet out, miss the hole altogether. And Wilson named names.

        Spalding, whose Strata balls did not perform well in Wilson's tests, has filed suit. Others also have been vocal in their protests.

        Wilson has successfully opened up another front in the golf ball marketing wars. No one had pursued balance as a selling point, then Wilson got ahold of the technology to make it an issue.

        The Staff True balls can never be out of balance because the ball's core — the flawed part of unbalanced balls — weighs the same as the ball's cover.

        Reese was in town last week, using the time-honored technique of floating balls in a salt-water solution to determine if they were balanced. Every Staff True ball checked out, while competitors purchased off the shelf in the pro shop didn't fare so well. For one brand, eight of the first nine balls settled with the same spot facing up — a failing score.

        Said Reese: “It all comes down to this: Do you want a ball that might cause you to miss?”

Distance, feel still key

        The science looks sound, but golf does not approach a science for most players. Extra distance and better feel — the calling cards of the last two sensations in ball marketing, the Lady Precept and the Titleist ProV1 — will continue to be powerful selling points.

        “The best thing is to go to a place that sells all these balls and ask someone who would know what to do,” Hauer said. “Tell them, "This is how I hit the ball normally, but this is how I want it to go,' and see how they can help you.”

Guide to Tristate courses and complete local golf coverage



Sports Stories
- Choosing golf ball can be boggling
Golf rulesmakers agree on policy for hot drivers /a>
Golf tip from Gil Morgan
Coming up this week

Reds 14, Brewers 5
Reds box, runs
Griffey closer to playing
Kearns' maturity shows
Reds Notebook: Larson on fire in Louisville
Brewers (9-25) have sinking feeling
Diamondbacks 4, Pirates 3
Angels 3, Tigers 2
Mariners 5, Blue Jays 4
Red Sox 12, Athletics 6
Stokes, Barker ready to lead UC
Bengals turn attention to signing draft picks
Cincinnati high school results

 

Latest Headline News
Updated Every 30 Minutes
SPORTS NEWS

49ers Look to Relocate New Stadium

Paterno Won't Coach Penn St.-Temple Game

San Francisco 2016 Games Bid in Jeopardy

NCAA: Athletes Graduating at Higher Rate

Mauresmo Advances at WTA Championships

Randhawa Takes Lead at HSBC Champions

Bob Knight Approaches Winning Milestone

Bears-Giants a Key Game Despite Injuries

Spurrier Shadow Looms Large in Florida

A's, Cisco Reach Deal to Build Ballpark


Cincinnati.Com
Search our site by keyword:  
Search also: News | Jobs | Homes | Cars | Classifieds | Obits | Coupons | Events | Dining
Movies/DVDs | Video Games | Hotels | Golf | Visitor's Guide | Maps/Directions | Yellow Pages

  CINCINNATI.COM  |  NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help


Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors | Subscribe
Newspaper advertising | Web advertising | Place a classified | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2007. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 12/19/2002.