Thursday, September 27, 2001
Experts' opinions sealed verdict
Made decision to acquit 'easier'
By Marie McCain
The Cincinnati Enquirer
Five of the six days of Cincinnati Police Officer Stephen Roach's trial were filled with testimony from citizens, fellow officers and training officials.
But in the end, after 25 witnesses took the stand, Hamilton County Municipal Judge Ralph E. Winkler gave the most weight to the testimony of two defense experts: an optometrist and a psychologist.
The expert testimony sealed it. It made a difficult decision easier, the judge said Wednesday in acquitting Officer Roach of negligent homicide and obstructing official business in the shooting death of Timothy Thomas.
The first expert, Dr. Paul Michel, an optometrist based in Littleton, Colo., discussed the pitfalls of judging police shootings in low light.
Much of his testimony was meant to dispel the prosecution's contention that Officer Roach didn't follow his training when he fired on Mr. Thomas.
Officer Roach shot the Evanston man April 7 after Mr. Thomas emerged from a blind corner at the end of a dark alley in Over-the-.
According to testimony, Mr. Thomas' hands were at his waist, a place where a gun can be kept.
Dr. Michel, who has worked with the Los Angeles Police Department and the FBI, said fast movement and low light hamper vision.
The brain compensates by drawing on an officer's experience and training to create a picture the person recognizes, Dr. Michel said.
Emotion also can affect vision, he added.
The shooting occurred at 2 a.m. on a Saturday in a high-crime area known for heavy drug trafficking.
Though Mr. Thomas did not have a gun, Dr. Michel contended that it was difficult for Officer Roach to distinguish the man's empty hand from a small handgun.
Officer Roach's training meant that if he perceived his life was in danger, he was to respond with deadly force, the defense maintained.
Dr. Paul Lewinski, a psychologist from Minnesota State University, testified that Officer Roach was traumatized when he was interviewed by investigators three days after the shooting.
Prosecutors had argued that Officer Roach gave police differing statements first that he shot because he thought Mr. Thomas had a gun, then that Mr. Thomas made a quick movement that scared him, and so he shot.
Dr. Lewinski said Officer Roach was profoundly affected by the shooting and was susceptible to coercive statements from investigators.
Curfew to remain through Friday
Roach not guilty; city under curfew
Acquittals based on self-defense
Anger, fear, sadness felt on streets after verdict
Anger is there, but chaos isn't
Experts' opinions sealed verdict
Lynch: Ruling 'sets us back'
PULFER: Turmoil of April finally over - or is it?
Q & A
Text of Judge Winkler verdict
Then and now: Race relations
Victim's point of view part of justice, too
The spirit of giving
Training kicked in after Pentagon attack
Anti-lead forces join up
Cheviot makes paving progress
FOP mum on mayor race
Graham plans visit to Cincinnati
Harmony charter school is homeless, state discovers
Local Jews observe holiest day of the year
Parents' aid has new digs
Tristate A.M. Report
TV internet coach drills students on etiquette
Charges unlikely against priest
Conese indicted in funds scandal
Conference on kids opens
Mason fund may help fix sidewalks
Conviction reinstated in 3-year-old's death
New districts called unfair
Prosecutor will remain on bribery case
Taft needs $1 billion to cover deficit
$21M sought to build new N. Ky. college
$550,000 for restoration in jeopardy
Dems blast census in district debate
Kentucky News Briefs
W. Ky. students document scene
West Nile here; risk said slight