Saturday, June 16, 2001
Judge frowns on local jail fee
Inmates who paid might get a refund
By Dan Horn
The Cincinnati Enquirer
Hamilton County's practice of charging inmates a fee to stay in its jails may be unconstitutional.
U.S. District Judge S. Arthur Spiegel warned county officials Friday that the pay to stay policy may violate the rights of inmates.
The judge also said the Hamilton County case could challenge the Ohio law that allows similar pay to stay policies.
Judge Spiegel described his ruling as a preliminary finding that could change before he makes a final decision.
But if the preliminary finding stands, Hamilton County could be forced to refund up to $1 million that has been collected from inmates.
The judge issued his findings Friday when he denied the county's request to dismiss a lawsuit filed by a former inmate who was forced to pay a fee.
The judge's decision means the case will proceed to trial, unless the two sides settle out of court.
The former inmate, Anthony Allen, was arrested last year in Cincinnati after a police officer did a computer check of his license plate and found an outstanding warrant. Mr. Allen was released from jail 12 hours later after police realized the computer entry was wrong.
But the Bond Hill man never got back the $30 deputies confiscated as his pay to stay fee.
His lawyer, Robert Newman, filed a class action lawsuit claiming the county policy was unconstitutional. The problem, Mr. Newman said, is that county officials charge the fee before they know whether the inmates are guilty.
Mr. Newman said Judge Spiegel's ruling suggests the county policy is in trouble.
The handwriting is on the wall, Mr. Newman said. This system is going to have to go.
County lawyers have argued the policy does not penalize the innocent because anyone who is not convicted can get a refund. Mr. Newman said that's not good enough.
You can only take money (from an inmate) if they are found guilty, Mr. Newman said.
Sheriff Simon Leis, who runs the jails, declined comment. Prosecutor Mike Allen, whose office is defending the sheriff, said the state law allowing pay to stay fees is constitutional.
Both sides in the case agree it is the first of its kind in Ohio, and possibly in the nation.
Dozens of cities and counties levy similar fees.
Speedway spectacle should set record
N.Ky. leaders pitch $43M arena for NKU
Former president of XU 'did wonders'
Judge frowns on local jail fee
Schools ready for new U.S. law
Aquarium is reeling in visitors
Dirtiest job lies ahead at Fernald
Nuclear talent getting scarcer
6 minutes a day to better police
Local Jews going to Israel while others cancel trips
Officers break up a cocaine drug ring
Booth says cultural audits can wait
Center fights to keep funding
Court to decide funding fate
Gathering offers blast from the past
In Lakota, students putting the squeeze on the district
Kentucky News Briefs
Lawmakers told of area's boom
Ministry says creek will be clean
Post-riot legal bills for city hit $270,000
Presbyterians may end gay ban
Sidewalk tax gets nixed
Taft: Keep tuition hike low
Taft urges healthy lifestyles
Weed is nettlesome in Ky.
Enquirer reporter receives top honor
Tristate A.M. Report