Friday, May 11, 2001

Lawsuit seeks damages for dog




The Associated Press

        DAYTON, Ohio — A couple who says their dog was injured by an invisible fence is going to court to try and recover damages for emotional distress they say the animal suffered.

        The lawsuit was filed in Montgomery County Common Pleas Court by Andrew and Alyce Pacher, of Vandalia, who identify themselves as “pet guardians” of Boomer. The lawsuit, which refers to Boomer as a plaintiff, requests damages of more than $25,000.

[photo] Andrew Pacher pets his dog Boomer in Vandalia, Ohio.
(Associated Press photo)
| ZOOM |
        Also on the side of Boomer, a 4-year-old male golden retriever, is attorney Paul Leonard, a former lieutenant governor and ex-mayor of Dayton. Mr. Leonard says he's an animal lover hoping to upgrade the legal status of dogs in Ohio.

        Mr. Leonard said Boomer suffered psychological damage from second-degree burns he received when he tried to run through the Pachers' invisible fence.

        An invisible fence is an electrical wire buried in the ground. The dog wears a special collar that shocks the animal if it wanders beyond the fence.

        Attorney Scott Oxley, who represents the fence company, said pets are considered personal property under Ohio law.

        “This (lawsuit) was filed by Boomer. That's how I read it,” Mr. Oxley said. “It's my opinion that it's clear dogs cannot sue under Ohio law.”

        Mr. Leonard acknowledged that there is no precedent in Ohio for an animal to have an attorney represent it in court.

        “That's one of the principles of law we're going to ask the court to change,” Mr. Leonard said. “This is a lawsuit where we are trying to plow some new ground.”

        The lawsuit, which was filed against the Invisible Fence Co. of Dayton, is the first case for Mr. Leonard's newly formed Center for Animal Law and Advocacy.

        Boomer repeatedly escaped from the Pachers' back yard after the fence was installed. When the couple complained, a consultant for the fence company advised them to use two collars on the retriever, and the consultant adjusted the voltage on both collars, according to the lawsuit.

        Later that day, the couple's two children heard Boomer whining on the front porch and let him inside, where the animal collapsed on the floor. Several days later, the Pachers discovered open wounds on the dog's neck, the lawsuit states.

        Several messages requesting comment were left Thursday with the company.

       



Luken: Taste fest will go on
FBI investigating hate crimes
Roach case illustrates levels of homicides
Jammin' on Main acts jump river
RADEL: Lynch protests
Track drives tourism boom
Driving to Destin? Take more cash
Hearts in the hills
Caesar Creek put on alert
Coalition developing plans to expand backup child care
Crack house to dream house
Draud: Timing not right for run
Energy policy raising coal revival hopes
Foal deaths begin to drop; cause unknown
Independence, fired chief settle
Inmate before Ohio's high court
Judge sees 3 of his former law clerks on TV's 'Millionaire'
Labor groups join for state workers
- Lawsuit seeks damages for dog
Message: Stay off the tracks
Old cemetery has development stymied
Powers Street bridge opens today
Prevailing wage law reviewed
Protest leader's father receives threats
Talawanda assistant up for top job
Teens charged in S&L heists
Wife sues after husband wins $250K, disappears
Witnesses agree with officer's shooting story
Kentucky News Briefs
Tristate A.M. Report