Cincinnati.Com
NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help
Currently:
46°F
Partly Sunny
Weather | Traffic
The Enquirer
HOME
NEWS
ENTERTAINMENT
SPORTS
REDS
BENGALS
LOCAL GUIDE
MULTIMEDIA
ARCHIVES
SEARCH
 
 TODAY'S ENQUIRER 
 Front Page 
-- Local News 
 Sports 
 Business 
 Editorials 
 Tempo 
 Home Style 
 Travel 
 Health 
 Technology 
 Weather 
 Back Issues 
 Search 
 Subscribe 

 SPORTS 
 Bearcats 
 Bengals 
 High School 
 Reds 
 Xavier 

 VIEWPOINTS 
 Jim Borgman 
 Columnists 
 Readers' views 

 ENTERTAINMENT 
 Movies 
 Dining 
 Horoscopes 
 Lottery Results 
 Local Events 
 Video Games 

 CINCINNATI.COM 
 Giveaways 
 Maps/Directions 
 Send an E-Postcard 
 Coupons 
 Visitor's Guide 

 CLASSIFIEDS 
 Jobs 
 Cars 
 Homes 
 Obituaries 
 General 
 Place an ad 

 HELP 
 Feedback 
 Subscribe 
 Search 
 Newsroom Directory 




 
Thursday, April 26, 2001

Justin case now goes to Ky. Supreme Court


Adoption battle has been waged for years

By Kristina Goetz
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        The Kentucky Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that will decide the fate of one 4-year-old boy and could set a precedent for interpreting adoption law in the commonwealth.

        The court has agreed to review the Kentucky Court of Appeals' most recent ruling: that Justin, who has been at the center of an interstate custody battle most of his life, should stay with the Girard, Ohio, couple that has been trying to adopt him.

Justin
Justin
        “We're very pleased the court decided to hear the case,” said Stephanie Dietz, the lawyer representing Justin's biological parents, Regina Moore and Jerry Dorning of Northern Kentucky.

        Even before Justin was born in February 1997, his biological mother, now of Burlington, had asked Cheryl and Richard Asente whether they wished to adopt him. The Asentes already had adopted Justin's biological brother, Joey.

        But after Justin's birth, she and Mr. Dorning changed their minds and Justin remained with them. When Justin was 11 months old, the couple placed him with the Asentes and signed consent-to-adopt forms in February 1998. Though the forms state they become irrevocable after 20 days, Ms. Moore and Mr. Dorning said they signed them only after an attorney assured them they would have until a March 1998 hearing to change their minds.

        They changed their minds, but the hearing never was held.

        Thus began the legal battles, with each side suing and countersuing the other in Kentucky and Ohio for custody.

        “I would hope that this would indicate to the legislature that there is a need for change,” Ms. Dietz said, adding that she expects the court's spotlight to be on the consent of her clients and whether it was given voluntarily.

        “Whatever decision they make in the Kentucky Supreme Court is it,” she said. “Whatever decision they make is final.”

        The move will guarantee that the case will be in court at least another year. And legal experts say the case may cast a long legal shadow over future adoption cases.

        Robert Stenger has been a family and constitution law professor at the University of Louisville for 27 years. There are two reasons the court may have decided to hear the case, he said:

        The first would be to rule on an extenuating circumstance to the Justin case, or to take a hard line on upholding a finalized adoption.

        A decadelong trend in the commonwealth, as well as across the nation, he said, is for courts to uphold finalized adoptions.

        “Blood is strong; but once you've signed the paper and you know what you are doing, then it becomes a little harder,” Dr. Stenger said. “You are no longer a parent.”

        Susan Garner Eisenman, the Asentes' Ohio attorney, said the Kentucky Supreme Court's decision to weigh in on the case could be because of the high level of public interest.

        “Unfortunately it means further delay,” she said. “It just means the ordeal of the Asente family will be prolonged. (But) we believe the Court of Appeals' decision was very well-written and definitive.

        Both sides say they want a speedy decision in the interest of Justin.

        “We are hoping for an expedited resolution,” Ms. Eisenman said.

Timeline of Justin case
       



Most in riots were outsiders
Settlement delayed in profiling suit
State helps make riot recovery loans cheaper
Tarbell loses try to oust manager
School boost alters budget
Report details airport backups
Commissioners balk at seat-license deal
12 accused of large fencing scheme
Child badly hurt in fire
CROWLEY: Aftermath helped each candidate
Lebanon cable ad vote raises objections
PULFER: Cancer event
Mold scare closes second room
Pioneers' way of life is recreated
Teacher concerns outlined
$3 fee to fix water system
Alarmed about drugs, schools involve parents
Execution set for May 15; killer's lawyers plan appeal
Faith prompts political exit
House GOP reconsiders electronic slot machines
- Justin case now goes to Ky. Supreme Court
Miami U. joins with tribe in language study
Ohio rules county can ban smoking inside all public places
Sheriff probing letters to trustee
Slain man knew his killer, Newport police suspect
Typhoid traced to sex encounters
Woman's death tied to deal gone bad
Kentucky News Briefs
Tristate A.M. Report

 

Latest Headline News
Updated Every 30 Minutes
AP TOP HEADLINE NEWS

Iraqi Official: 150,000 Civilians Dead

Sen. Allen Concedes Defeat in Virginia

Bush, Pelosi Hold White House Talks

Massive Recall of Acetaminophen Underway

Mubarak Warns Against Hanging Saddam

Bolton Unlikely to Win Senate Approval

AP: Startling Findings in Tillman Probe

Ed Bradley of '60 Minutes' Dies at 65

U.S. Rises in Auto Reliability Ratings

49ers Look to Relocate New Stadium



Cincinnati.Com
Search our site by keyword:  
Search also: News | Jobs | Homes | Cars | Classifieds | Obits | Coupons | Events | Dining
Movies/DVDs | Video Games | Hotels | Golf | Visitor's Guide | Maps/Directions | Yellow Pages

  CINCINNATI.COM  |  NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help


Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors | Subscribe
Newspaper advertising | Web advertising | Place a classified | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2007. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 12/19/2002.