Wednesday, April 04, 2001

Foes say bigger jail would hinder core development




By Cindy Schroeder
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        INDEPENDENCE — Opponents of an expanded jail in downtown Covington told Kenton Fiscal Court on Tuesday that a larger jail would be a costly, short-term solution that would hinder downtown development.

        “From the numbers I've seen and heard, it would cost way more to expand the jail than to build a jail that would meet state standards, said Jim Young, a 26-year Covington resident.

        He added a jail expansion would be an inappropriate use for an area that serves as the gateway to Covington and Kentucky.

        “I urge you to consider this carefully and please build the jail somewhere else where it would meet state standards,” Mr. Young said.

        Kenton Judge-executive Dick Murgatroyd said county officials will respond to questions and concerns about the jail expansion at the fiscal court's April 17 meeting. That meeting will be at 7 p.m. at the Kenton County Courthouse in Independence.

        “I hope to respond to all e-mails I've received by the end of this week,” Mr. Murgatroyd said. On April 17, “we'll try to cover and respond to everything you've brought up tonight.”

        Several opponents of the jail expansion said they were surprised that some county officials — including County Commissioner Adam Koenig — indicated Tuesday they had not seen a recent study by Southbank Partners that was critical of a jail expansion.

        “We were stunned by that,” Sue Sampson, a 16-year Licking Riverside resident, said after the meeting. “Maybe we've been talking two figures all along. Maybe that's part of the problem.”

        Ms. Sampson sought clarification on a number of issues, including the cost of expanding the present jail in the county building at Third and Court streets versus building a new one at Interstate 275 and Ky. 17 — the 3L site the fiscal court rejected last year.

        Ms. Sampson said the February Southbank study said the current high-rise jail would cost $1.5 million more a year to operate than a single-level detention center.

        She also questioned the study's claims that the “fully loaded cost” of the expanded jail, including all costs and contingencies, would be $36 million, versus $26 million for the 3L site.

        Mr. Koenig said that he had not seen Southbank's report, but he added the cost figures as presented Tuesday “didn't make any logical sense,” because no decisions had been made on a final building design for the 3L site and there were questions about cleanup costs there.
       

       



Priest savors his role as XU president
Multistate lottery proposal won't fly
Butler offers drop-offs for newborns
City's finances 'not rosy'
Kids absorb story of water
RADEL: Painful case
SAMPLES: Beverly Hills
Ah, spring, and then some, arrives on April's airs
Local cancer victim supports funding
School bus driver's drug test positive
Humanitarian award winners are announced
39 jobs at stake in levy vote
Director will return to work
AA intersections will get new lights
Autopsy will be today for hanged murder convict
Boone police merger approved
Cincinnati initiates big sweep
Concerns on airport are heard
Covington OKs early Sunday beer
Firm owes Medicaid, auditor says
- Foes say bigger jail would hinder core development
'Friends' assist students
Jefferson Davis portrait removed
Middletown principal quits, saying progress slow
Neyer seeks development boss
Pact uses federal 727 to extradite
Tobacco lawyers still anger former FDA head
UK's health-care costs rise up to 45% for faculty, staff
Kentucky News Briefs
Tristate A.M. Report