Saturday, February 03, 2001
New hormone-replacer called better
Cincinnati-made drug said to have fewer side effects
By Tim Bonfield
The Cincinnati Enquirer
A hormone replacement therapy made in Cincinnati could help reduce side effects that cause many women to quit the medication.
The potential benefits come from the way the pill is made, rather than the medications it contains, say two experts in women's health from Yale University and the University of Rochester who spoke at a recent seminar in Cincinnati on hormone replacement therapy.
A major problem in hormone replacement therapy is discontinuance, said Dr. Philip Sarrel, a professor of obstetrics, gynecology and psychiatry at the Yale University School of Medicine.
About 40 percent of U.S. women ages 50 to 74 try hormone replacement therapy to control hot flashes and other symptoms caused by menopause. However, about 25 percent of women quit taking the pills in the first month, and up to 80 percent quit within two years.
Dr. Sarrel said women can get better control with Cenestin, a still-new hormone replacement drug made by Duramed Pharmaceuticals Inc., than with the market-leading product, Premarin, made by Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals.
Blood test data presented at the seminar indicate that Premarin pills can release anywhere from 15 percent to 60 percent of their estrogen ingredients within two hours. But Cenestin consistently releases 30 percent to 40 percent of its estrogens during that time.
I think (the difference in
dose consistency) is clinically significant, Dr. Sarrel said.
The pill debate is important because millions of American women are affected by menopause, and more will be as the baby boom generation ages.
An estimated 20 million women will reach menopause in the next decade. Already a $2.5 billion industry, analysts forecast the hormone replacement market to expand to nearly $4 billion by 2005.
But hormone replacement also has been a controversial topic.
Scientists continue to debate whether hormone therapy can prevent heart disease or increase the risk. Animal-rights groups have criticized the use of pregnant horses as the most common source of hormone therapy medications. Women who take hormone replacement therapy also can increase their risk of breast and uterine cancer.
Presentations in Cincinnati focused on technical issues.
Premarin was state-of-the-art in the 1940s, and it is still the most widely used. The problem is that this is an old product, said Dr. Henry Hess, an associate clinical professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Rochester School of Medicine.
Premarin was introduced in 1942. Its active ingredients come from the urine of pregnant mares, and the pills are coated with pharmaceutical shellac, a substance derived from beetle husks.
In part because Premarin was approved so long ago, the amount of hormone in the pills is allowed to range more widely and release less consistently than medications seeking FDA approval today, Dr. Hess said.
Cenestin hit the market in March 1999 after Duramed spent years seeking approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Its active ingredients are derived from yam and soybean plants.
Cenestin differs from Premarin because its ingredients are coated with polymers during manufacture. As the Cenestin pill moves through the intestine, the polymers break up, releasing the hormones at a more even, steady pace than Premarin.
In theory, a more consistent medication can help avoid ups and downs in hormone levels that doctors say can cause problems such as breast tenderness, mid-cycle bleeding, migraines, mood swings and continued hot flashes, Dr. Hess said.
In fact, Dr. Hess said his practice group has treated more than 200 women with Cenestin and many report significant improvement in reducing unwanted problems.
However, such information is anecdotal. Some doctors say they are still waiting for controlled head-to-head studies comparing side effects among users of Premarin and Cenestin. Those studies have not been completed.
With a more predictable release, you are likely to get a more predictable biological response. But is there enough of a difference to show a clinical effect (such as reduced side effects in women)? I don't think anyone can say, because there haven't been any studies, said Dr. James Liu, director of the University of Cincinnati's division of reproductive endocrinology.
Dr. Liu said he often prescribes Cenestin for women starting hormone replacement therapy, but for women already taking Premarin he hasn't seen enough data to suggest they should switch.
Both are very good products and there is no real difference in pricing, Dr. Liu said.
Wyeth-Ayerst, said the dose dissolution information presented last week did not prove anything.
The overall body of scientific evidence does not support claims that any other product delivers a more effective dose of estrogen for women using HRT than Premarin, said spokesman Doug Petkus.
Duramed thrives on new drugs
Powerball wants to add Ohio
Accomplice disputes killer's death-row appeal
County punishes probation officers
Judge's double-dipping called legal
NKU homecoming king needn't be he
'Senioritis' can cheat students' futures
Tailpipe deal may be struck for Ky.
New hormone-replacer called better
Ross High teen wins $20,000
SAMPLES: Land-grab law used unfairly
Thomas More reopens search for president
Westbound FWW to close for repair
Guard dies, 4 injured in prison van crash
Budget 'clouds' loom for mental health
Bunning, Lucas get assignments
Cabby wants city to let him deliver flowers
Child alerts family to flames in house
Common Pleas gains 2 judges
Defendants indicted in 3 cases
HOWARD: Hardee's helps with heat bills
Ice sends cars skidding
Kenton Co. tax protest suit grows
Two on Mason council to step down
With year to go, attorney's race heats up
Coal firm would reopen pond that spilled
Paducah exposure records incomplete
Prosecutor: No evidence of hazing