Wednesday, November 29, 2000

Some question attention to spill


EPA: Agency 'in this for the long haul'

By Mark R. Chellgren
The Associated Press

        FRANKFORT — It has been called one of the worst environmental disasters in the region's history. Yet some in Kentucky wonder if the coal sludge spill in Martin County last month has received the attention it deserves.

        Aloma Dew, chairwoman of the state Environmental Quality Commission, wondered whether the “poor people” affected by the spill have been helped as much as the “fuzzy little animals” harmed by other environmental disasters.

        “It just seems like we play second fiddle to the rest of the world when we have a disaster in our own back yard,” said C.V. Bennett III, another member of the commission.

        Art Smith, a representative of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which has been overseeing the cleanup, said the EPA has dedicated the resources to cope with the disaster. “EPA is in this for the long haul,” Mr. Smith said.

        The commission summoned representatives of state and federal disaster agencies as well as the Martin County Coal Corp. on Tuesday to talk about the spill, what is being done to clean it up and what will be done to prevent it from happening again in the dozens of other slurry ponds that dot Kentucky's mine lands.

        Officials acknowledged they still don't know what caused the bottom of the slurry pond to crack open and spill 250 million gallons of slurry into two adjacent creeks through abandoned mining tunnels underneath the pond. Authorities knew about the old tunnels, but historically the danger from sludge ponds has come from failing dams.

        Five water systems, three in Kentucky and two in West Virginia, had to find new water sources and some of them are still in use. But other than a chemical used to coagulate the debris created when coal is cleaned, the chemical makeup of the slurry is little different than the ordinary rocks and dirt found in the area.

        Robert Ware, assistant director of the Division of Water, said the chemical is biodegradable, has not been found in detectable amounts and there is no evidence of groundwater contamination.

        The biggest problem has simply been the huge amount of oozy sludge, said Thomas Meikle, director of surface mining for A.T. Massey, the parent company of Martin County Coal. It has been compared to the consistency of wet cement.

        “Essentially we're dealing with a bunch of mud and we're trying to get it cleaned up as fast as we can,” Mr. Meikle said.

        Shoveling up the dried material has proved much easier. It will be disposed of just as other coal-mining waste.

       



Hospitals refusing patients
Council looking for new ideas
TV reporter recalls chilling interview
RADEL: Klan circus
Schools' funding faces pinch
WEBN admits hoax
YWCA celebrates renewed building
Audit faults foster agency
Norwood school levy keeps four-vote victory in recount
Accused killer to be examined
Charges unlikely in hotel drowning
City rejects road to mall
CROWLEY: Yes, already
Dead man reportedly had drugs
Hamilton battling budget blues
Health board to fight cutting rest home, day care inspections
Henrys reimbursing state
Homeless but unhurt, 75-year-old escapes fire
Hopes ride high for 2 N. Ky. teams
Ky. sales zoom with $130M Powerball pot
Opening remarks heard in theft case
Police think Highland man killed wife, then self
Portune rates possible council successors
Protesters swarm Lucas' office
School gets a book boon
Schools' chief faces tough goals
- Some question attention to spill
Taft asked to step in at power plant in Clermont
Talawanda weighs new schools
Village to get 3rd mayor of year
Kentucky News Briefs
Tristate A.M. Report