Monday, May 01, 2000
Ohio courts re-examined
Selection policies at issue
By Dan Horn
The Cincinnati Enquirer
A state commission wants to change the way Ohio's courts select judges and juries.
In a report released today, the Ohio Courts Futures Commission concluded the state's courts would be fairer and more efficient with a new selection process.
The commission, which began reviewing the court system in 1997, recommended creating a non-partisan panel to set new standards for evaluating all prospective judges.
The panel would draft minimum qualifications for judges and tell voters whether candidates met those standards.
The panel also would submit a list of approved candidates when the governor wants to appoint judges to fill open seats.
The panel did not go the next step, long urged by advocates of merit selection, which would end judicial elections and create a body of Ohioans who would choose judges from among candidates who met its criteria.
Also ignored was another process, in which voters and the governor continue to pick judges, but incumbents periodically must win voters' approval in uncontested elections to retain their jobs.
The Futures Commission also suggested revamping the jury selection process by making more people eligible for jury service.
Under the commission's proposal, names of potential jurors could be drawn from vehicle registrations, driver's licenses and other public directories. Jurors are now drawn from voter registration lists.
The changes are among dozens recommended in the commission's 115-page report.
The commission educators, lawyers, judges and business people was appointed three years ago by the Ohio Chief Justice Thomas Moyer to evaluate the court system and prepare it for the next 25 years.
None of this is radical change, Justice Moyer said. But we're talking about a system that by nature looks to the past.
Commission co-chairman Robert Duncan said the changes in the judicial and jury selection process could bring more diversity and accountability to the courts.
Other recommendations include:
„Eliminating mayor's courts. Instead of allowing small-town mayors, who often are not lawyers, to decide minor cases, use trained judicial officers.
„Creating specialized courts, modeled on drug courts in Hamilton and other counties. Environmental courts, business courts and family courts are possibilities.
„Expanding the use of new technology. Create a technology standards committee to evaluate new technologies and ensure all state courts are compatible.
Stadium overruns cut parking plans
FWW construction nearing the end of the road
Fan honors Crosley Field memories
Newborn drop-off proposed
Ohio courts re-examined
Springsteen delivers wallop of classic rock
Vietnamese keep faith here
Priest also a war refugee
Utility bill can be paid online
Youth to preserve Holocaust legacy
Kidnap suspect headed to Ky.
On the job with the Foal Patrol
Energetic Prine rocks Taft Theatre
GET TO IT
Opera casts Summer Festival
Queen City's moments to shine reflected in book
Ruthven's pig is a choo-choo
Sugar Ray fans get up-close look
She keeps 'Becker' honest
$6M study to evaluate Interstate 75
Boone's newest park hooks plenty of anglers
Dr. Pembaur dies; won lawsuit for illegal search
Fairfield HS reconsiders class times
Ohio's overtime bill rising
Report: Ohio must help kids pass test
Results of our E-poll
Sheppard ruling challenged
State paid to feed lawmakers during lengthy sessions
Talks, shows highlight Worldfest
Trails rated top need