Sunday, January 16, 2000
The war on manure
EPA pushing for better control over farm waste
BY JAMES HANNAH
The Associated Press
HIGHLAND, Ohio On his hog farm in rural southwest Ohio, Marvin Harrick has more to worry about than low pork prices. He fears the government will impose unnecessarily costly rules on manure and waste-water runoff.
I don't want to pollute. I don't feel like I am, either, Mr. Harrick said. I drink water out of this well out here.
Mr. Harrick has been working the 800-acre family farm, decorated with signs promoting pork, for 20 years. He hopes to raise about 1,000 pigs this year.
The Ohio Farm Bureau, which lobbies lawmakers on behalf of small-scale livestock producers like Mr. Harrick, says they are alarmed by the direction the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking.
My opinion is the U.S. EPA is out of control, said John Fisher, president of the bureau. It's my prediction that we will take our initiatives to the court system.
In February 1998, the Clinton administration released a Clean Water Action Plan designed to reduce the runoff of pollutants from farms. Last August, the EPA proposed guidelines to states that would require more feedlots to get EPA permits and encourage the rest to come up with voluntary anti-pollution plans.
Regulators say runoff from farms can kill fish and contaminate drinking-water supplies.
This is a very significant national problem, said Chuck Fox, assistant administrator for the EPA's office of water.
Mr. Fox said that states have been interpreting existing pollution regulations differently and that the EPA guidelines are an attempt to make sure the rules are applied uniformly.
There are 450,000 animal-feeding operations in the United States. Of those, about 20,000 are concentrated operations required to obtain permits under the Clean Water Act. However, Mr. Fox said, only 3,000 to 4,000 of those operations have such permits.
Concentrated operations are generally defined numerically they have more than 1,000 beef cows or relatively larger numbers of smaller animals.
However, under the guidelines, the EPA can also define concentrated operations as those that directly discharge waste into waters, those that have animals coming into direct contact with waterways, or those that are significantly contributing to impairment of a water body or watershed.
That could get down to a smaller operation, Mr. Fox said.
Mr. Fisher said the farm bureau could take the EPA to court over how much it is leaving to its own interpretation.
When we are continually bombarded with unnecessary, unscientific regulations and costs you have to absorb and you can't see the benefit to anybody you get a little bit perturbed, Mr. Fisher said. They're wanting to keep lowering the threshold down to smaller and smaller operations. If you have one animal, they'd like to control you.
Mr. Fox disagrees.
It is absolutely voluntary for the vast majority of operations in this country, he said. However, he acknowledged the EPA's goal is that every animal-feeding operation in the country have such a plan by 2009.
The plans could include modifying animal diets to reduce the amount of nutrients in manure, changing the way manure is handled, keeping records to track manure, and adopting conservation practices that minimize the movement of pollutants from the soil into the water.
Mr. Fox said the plans will not necessarily involve a lot of paperwork.
Many farmers will find it in their economic interest to keep track of their manure, he said.
Hog prices hit a historic low in December 1998, driving many farmers out of business. In 1999, the number of hog farms in the United States fell 15 percent to 90,190.
But environmental groups insist the pollution guidelines are needed in Ohio and that the EPA rules will not put any more farms out of business.
These are things they should be doing already to make sure they are good neighbors and protective of the environment, said Susan Studer of the Ohio Environmental Council.
Mr. Harrick considers himself a good neighbor who is just trying to make a living in an industry where nobody's made a dime in the past year. He worries about the future of his farm and that of his 11-year-old son.
What's going to happen 10 years from now if he decides, 'Dad, I want to farm?' Mr. Harrick said.
Jaywalking ticket leads to suspect in store clerk's killing
Parent alert on sex education
Thermal-imaging camera is firefighter's lifeline
The dream came true
Martin Luther King Day events
Remaking Sycamore Hill
Council to vote on grant for Mount Auburn company
Kings Island No. 1 park in Ohio
Top 50 North American amusement parks
Ohio GOP chiefs send mixed signals
'Honeymoon' over, Taft stays the course
Boat, travel show downtown
Centers join transplant coalition
Cincinnati Habitat not joining Tristate affiliates
Fernald panel backs process
DOE saluted for listening
New trauma system in works
Queen City's moments to shine reflected in book
Turfway's attendance rising
They're dancing with the voters
Clooney hopes to inject some 'live' into television
Clooney won't be upset if he doesn't return to 'ER'
Flying Cloud returning
Fun 'Arthur' leaves young fans singing
GET TO IT
Lopez-Cobos marks 500th with concert 'Lohengrin'
Open captioning has come
Poet putting haiku all over the town
Seton Hall refurbishing complete
'Sopranos' family values hit at least one sour note
At Sundance, a declaration for independents
With the Internet, it's too easy to disconnect
Even Sarah picks 'bums'
Time for Trixie's artwork is over
Antique show priced for everyone
Boy, 7, struck by train
Butler drug sweep nets 16 arrests
Cities consider skate park
Doctor released after court decides his trial was unfair
Leading the pig parade
Middletown considers bicycle park
New 'Civil War' comes to Aronoff
Police fighting confiscated gun law
Powerful lobbyists join forces, raise profile
Requests juggled at NKU
Schuler in line for GOP chairmanship
The war on manure