Sunday, January 16, 2000
Police fighting confiscated gun law
Some want to keep destroying weapons
The Associated Press
FRANKFORT Police officials are taking aim at a state law requiring them to sell confiscated guns rather than destroy them.
Police administrations in Louisville, Lexington and elsewhere have been chaffing under the law since it quietly slipped through the 1998 session as part of an anti-crime bill.
Some, like the Louisville Police Department, have simply refused to comply.
Most of the guns we seize were used to commit crimes. To recycle those guns and put them back on the street is a minor absurdity, said Officer Aaron Graham, spokesman for the Louisville Police Department.
Those opposed to the law have enlisted seven urban lawmakers to allow police to resume destroying confiscated guns.
All our bill says is that the decision should be left up to local law-enforcement officials, said Rep. Eleanor Jordan, D-Louisville, a co-sponsor of the measure.
Whether they auction off the guns, whether they destroy them, whether they do something else with them, that should be up to the police, Ms. Jordan said. In urban areas, though, I think we agree we want them destroyed.
The sponsor of the auctions provision, Rep. Bob Damron, D-Nicholasville, said police have no right to destroy confiscated guns. Once the guns are seized, they become property of the taxpayers.
Going out and cutting up a legal state asset that a citizen could buy is a misuse of public property, Mr. Damron said.
Under Mr. Damron's law, the money raised by selling guns to licensed gun dealers would buy bulletproof vests and other body armor for local police departments.
The Kentucky State Police supplied 214 guns for one auction in August, at which $33,800 was raised. Kentucky police departments seize up to 8,000 guns annually, Mr. Dam ron said.
Mr. Damron predicted that the bill, which was referred to the House Local Government Committee, would not survive the General Assembly.
It might get through the House, but I don't see it passing the Senate, which is more conservative than it used to be, he said.
Ms. Jordan agreed, saying she's already gotten letters from gun enthusiasts calling it a veiled gun control measure.
But I think this is something gun owners should support. We're saying each local government should be able to handle this as they wish without the state government mandating one policy statewide, Ms. Jordan said.
Jaywalking ticket leads to suspect in store clerk's killing
Parent alert on sex education
Thermal-imaging camera is firefighter's lifeline
The dream came true
Martin Luther King Day events
Remaking Sycamore Hill
Council to vote on grant for Mount Auburn company
Kings Island No. 1 park in Ohio
Top 50 North American amusement parks
Ohio GOP chiefs send mixed signals
'Honeymoon' over, Taft stays the course
Boat, travel show downtown
Centers join transplant coalition
Cincinnati Habitat not joining Tristate affiliates
Fernald panel backs process
DOE saluted for listening
New trauma system in works
Queen City's moments to shine reflected in book
Turfway's attendance rising
They're dancing with the voters
Clooney hopes to inject some 'live' into television
Clooney won't be upset if he doesn't return to 'ER'
Flying Cloud returning
Fun 'Arthur' leaves young fans singing
GET TO IT
Lopez-Cobos marks 500th with concert 'Lohengrin'
Open captioning has come
Poet putting haiku all over the town
Seton Hall refurbishing complete
'Sopranos' family values hit at least one sour note
At Sundance, a declaration for independents
With the Internet, it's too easy to disconnect
Even Sarah picks 'bums'
Time for Trixie's artwork is over
Antique show priced for everyone
Boy, 7, struck by train
Butler drug sweep nets 16 arrests
Cities consider skate park
Doctor released after court decides his trial was unfair
Leading the pig parade
Middletown considers bicycle park
New 'Civil War' comes to Aronoff
Police fighting confiscated gun law
Powerful lobbyists join forces, raise profile
Requests juggled at NKU
Schuler in line for GOP chairmanship
The war on manure