enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Tuesday, December 07, 1999

Judge invokes Santa Claus(e) in decision


Poetic ruling says Christmas is also secular

BY BEN L. KAUFMAN
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        Christmas has become so secular that the government does not violate the Constitution by declaring it a federal legal holiday, a federal judge ruled Monday.

        In dismissing a challenge to the holiday designation by a Hyde Park resident, U.S. District Judge Susan J. Dlott also wrote a poem, which said, in part:

        The court will uphold

        seemingly contradictory causes

        Decreeing “The Establishment” and “Santa”

        Both worthwhile Claus(es).

        Judge Dlott said the government is “merely acknowledging the secular cultural aspects of Christmas by declaring Christmas to be a legal public holiday. ... A government practice need not be exclusively secular to survive. ”

        She said Christmas has become so secular that it does not violate the opening clause of the First Amendment, which states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion ... ”

        Lawyer Richard Ganulin, who brought the suit last year, said he would appeal. “My disagreement with that conclusion is what motivated me to bring the lawsuit,” he said.

        Judge Dlott applied a three-pronged test to determine whether Dec. 25 as a national public Christmas holiday violated church-state separation. A statute must:

        • Have a secular purpose.

        • Neither advance nor inhibit religion as its principal or primary effect.

        • Not foster an excessive government entanglement with religion.

        Having found sufficient secular purpose, Judge Dlott said no reasonable person would see the federal holiday as an endorsement of Christianity “in particular or religion in general.”

        Giving federal employees the day off is “no more than recognizing the cultural significance of the holiday,” she continued. That it accommodates Christians who want to celebrate Jesus' birth “does not mean the holiday has an impermissible religious effect.”

       



Luken takes slap at Shirey
The story on toys: More kids are needy
- Judge invokes Santa Claus(e) in decision
UC group in Cuban drama
Their holiday trip helps others to see
An advanced lesson from the students
City told it needs to slash millions
Colerain recruiting citizens for 4th police academy
Compromise struck on The Banks
County wants break from prisoners
New arts center on drawing board
'Smooth' songwriter
$100M estate case ends, another starts
Campbell court clerk runs for re-election
Company pressure kills Elsmere jail proposal
Dems complain of Blackwell absences
Fans shriek for Ricky Martin
House tour is observatory fund-raiser
Old Capitol was setting for tale of two governors
School redistricting draws flak
Become part of historic photo
Brooks freed from jail to pay support
Lebanon festival reins in 70,000
Middletown adds salt storage
Prosecutor: death after rebuff
GET TO IT
Holiday TV schedule
TRISTATE DIGEST


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.