Saturday, May 22, 1999
Princeton seeks 3.95-mill levy
Money would maintain school staff
BY BERNIE MIXON
The Cincinnati Enquirer
SHARONVILLE The Princeton school board voted this week to place a 3.95-mill tax issue on the August ballot to raise money for operating expenses.
Revenue from the levy is expected to maintain staffing and programming planned for the 1999-2000 school year, maintain community schools and services such as nurses, counselors and transportation.
The board voted 4-0 on Wednesday to place the levy on the Aug. 4 ballot. If approved, the levy would cost the owner of an $80,000 home $96.78 in new taxes, according to the district.
We believe we can make it with the projections we have now and with prudent fiscal containment be able to have an excellent school district, said Board President Martha Iskyan. We have excellent teachers and will give the students the best education we can buy and also satisfy the residents.
School officials have said voters must pass a levy this year to avoid budget cuts in the 2000-2001 school year.
In November, voters defeated a 6.5-mill levy that was to raise about $10 million annually to meet expenses. Without the levy, the board voted to cut $4 million from the 1999-2000 budget.
In February, the board placed a 4.95-mill tax levy on the May ballot for general operating expenses.
In March, however, the board took it off after residents raised questions and said May was not the time for a tax levy.
If approved by voters, the levy would last about five years and begin generating revenue in 2000. An estimated $2.27 million would be collected in 2000 and about $6.1 million in follow ing years, according to the district.
The district estimates the levy would last through school year 2004-2005 if spending increases are kept at or below three percent. If spending is kept at that level, Princeton would come back to voters for another levy in 2004.
An independent group of Princeton citizens looked at the district's finances and concluded that the district was willing to trim some of the fat out of the budget.
Our assessment was that they made a cutback of positions and weren't adding those back in. Those were important reductions, said George Keyser, a committee member. It was felt they took the fat out of the system.
Mrs. Iskyan expects the levy campaign to be very low-key. ... It will be very much neighbor-to-neighbor. ...
In the coming days, Mrs. Iskyan said she will meet with a group of residents to map out a levy campaign strategy.
St. Ursula Senior Tea melds ideals
Has zero tolerance in schools gone too far?
Light rail to need new bridge
Prisons change rules for moms
Boy, 7, and mom arrested at school
First off-track-betting parlor could be open in Ohio by fall
Gamblers from SW Ohio among casinos' big losers
Record Hoosier Lotto jackpot fails to woo buyers
City police allocating federal grant
Cocaine and attack led to death
Fox Highway? It's up to agency
Jury says strangler should die
Kenton winnows 'wanted' warrants
Light turnout expected for primary
Movie on nuclear waste panned
Paper kayak takes Miami crew to competition
Trio sought in beating death
Pregnant senior loses valedictorian honor
Dancers whisper director's fitting finale
GET TO IT
Tribute to Shaw sublime memorial
A new look at Big Bone Lick
Molester charged with lying to immigration
Caution made on new betting
Ex-officer files suit against village
G. Vehr hired as UC lobbyist
Mason summer concerts get gift
Princeton seeks 3.95-mill levy
Report: Central State presidents erred
Strikers get added restrictions
Suit seeks to recover seized money