enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Wednesday, February 17, 1999

Water pact could curb annexation


Mason fears county offer has strings

BY SAUNDRA AMRHEIN
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        LEBANON — There could be a water shortage in Mason this summer unless the city and Warren County work out a way to bolster the city's dwindling water supply.

        Firefighting efforts could be at risk and bans on lawn watering might be slapped on residents because of squabbling over an agreement under which the county sells the city water.

        “We don't want to have any water usage restrictions,” said Dick Staten, Mason's vice mayor. “A fire threat is the No. 1 driving force. We need water to fight fires.”

        The proposal calls for the county to sell water to Mason until Cincinnati Water Works installs lines to serve the southern half of the city late this year.

        Mason, Warren County and Western Water Co. each recently have tapped into Cincinnati Water Works for fear that the Little Miami River Aquifer will not satisfy their long-term needs. If there's a drain on the system this summer because of a drought, Mason could have trouble getting by in the short term. That's why it needs to buy water from Warren County's well system until Cincinnati Water Works' supply flushes through late this year.

        Mason is paying Cincinnati Water Works $5 million to extend water lines into Mason to serve the southern half of the city. The lines will provide 5 million gallons of water a day.

        Last summer, Warren County sold Mason water on an emergency basis. But this time, the county is calling for a formal agreement. It's a pact some city officials fear could halt Mason's attempts to offer water to prospective development sites outside the city limits.

        “It's hard enough to do annexation that if we don't give our service away there's no way to do it,” Mr. Staten said. “There'd be no benefit.”

        The county's agreement says the city cannot offer water in unincorporated areas without county permission.

        Mason offers water service once a property owner agrees to annex to the city. The county gives final approval.

        But city officials worry this water agreement with the county could create barriers for annexation.

        Since 1988, Mason has annexed more land than any other municipality in Warren County. Mason's 33 annexations have included prime Deerfield Township areas, such as Paramount's Kings Island, and totaled nearly 4,000 acres.

        But commissioners said the clause in the agreement is standard procedure with all the cities and villages who obtain water from the county. It's in place so they don't start providing water in the county's jurisdiction.

        “It's a territorial deal when lines get so close together, the part in the middle is going to be fought over,” said Commissioner C. Michael Kilburn. “The question is how are we going to amicably come to a conclusion where both ... feel they have a return on their investment.”

        The county and city scheduled a March 4 meeting at the Warren County Administration Building to talk about the areas where their water lines approach one another. The water agreement could be settled at that time.

        The issue came to a head because a property owner on Hamilton Road in Turtlecreek Township plans to annex to Mason.

        The city had worked out an agreement to service the property owner with a decades-old water line even though the county also had water lines in the area.

        But this new water agreement could force Mason to seek the county's permission first, which caused city officials to object.

        Aside from the property owner and five lots in question, there are 100 undeveloped acres sitting between the county and city water lines. Such areas could pit the two against each other in future attempts to provide water and pay off infrastructure debt.

        “Guys, we got to work together. We all do the same things only for different jurisdictions,” Mr. Kilburn said. “When we get provincial, that's when we get attitudes.”

       



Taft faces life-or-death decision
Minister confident heaven awaits Berry
Prosecutor: Whipping daughter was murder
Ky. assembly could let Turfway add casino
Winburn pulls back electoral proposal
1,000 volunteer to search for Erica
Online therapy for MS
Teacher waives right to speedy trial
Uncle Sam wants dropouts, too
Flu cases below average
More foreheads showing ash cross
Riverfront tower landmark idea toppled
Top skater stays busy off the ice
Woman held on fake-ID charge
Couple appeal in fight for tot
Flynt trial could be delayed again
Judge says jury can hear murder suspect's statement
Museum celebrates posters
City to look at 12th Street plans
Fairfield schools aim higher on sixth-grade tests
Fire merger takes shape
Flaws found in planetarium deal
Landmark for Butler Co.
Local police talent recognized
Middletown board agrees to decide on mall plan
New bridge in Newport a challenge
Ohio 747 spot to get fixed early
Police: Man dodged 5 shots
Pride learned through a play
Regional vs. local focus of meeting
Roosters have to go, court rules
Sergeant is evaluated
Teacher directs 7th-graders to link science and writing
TRISTATE DIGEST
Village seeks outside help on landfill
- Water pact could curb annexation
YMCA plans to open four Dearborn Co. facilities


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.